I've seen Capt. Paul Watson (vegan) speak a few times, shared some drinks in a bar, and although I sometimes believe he's a bit far out, there are times when he really raises some interesting issues. His recent comment about a vegan in an SUV consuming less resources than a carnivore on a bicycle is a classic. Then there's his views that, from an ecological standpoint, earthworms are more important than humans and we're "a bunch of arrogant primates out-of-control."
The following extensive article in the New Yorker about him was well-written and researched. There's a statement in same that caused me to stop and think for several minutes:
"“People say, ‘You’re incredibly arrogant,’ ” Watson told me. “I say, when you’re dealing with a species that’s as arrogant as the human race you’ve got to be arrogant to believe that you can actually change it.” He regards civilization’s greatest artistic and cultural achievements—from architecture to music and film—as expressions of human vanity, “worthless to the earth.” He sometimes asks people to imagine the outrage that would occur if someone were to destroy, say, the Vatican or the “Mona Lisa,” and he compares that with the indifference that people exhibit toward the mass extinction of plants and animals. “In anthropocentric society, a harsh judgment is given to those that destroy or seek to destroy the creations of humanity,” he has written... yet if a human destroys the wonders of creation, the beauty of the natural world, then anthropocentric society calls such people loggers, miners, developers, engineers, and businessmen.”"
Extreme thoughts, but then again... how many "Mona Lisas" are we collectively destroying, needlessly, on a daily basis? Which is more important? An entire species, developed and evolved over billions of years, or a painting by Leonardo DaVinci?
I've spent a lot of time the past year and a half watching things grow from seed to maturity to death. The dazzling complexity, ingenuity, resiliance, diversity, and dynamic aspects of the plant kingdom just continually amazes and astounds me. "Modern" science and technology can't come close, in any aspect, to that which nature has accomplished (or is accomplishing). Yet, we are destroying, through our consumerism and ignorance, untold numbers of species, and that number is increasing and rate accelerating.
So, which is the greater crime, the destruction of a single work of genius, or mindless demolition of a complex interrelated "geniusness" that works?
[Full article here and below. Capt. Watson's website is here.]